The complete trader
Everything in the course compressed into one decision framework and one master checklist.
The full decision framework
Every sound trade walks the same path through this course. Context (M1, M4–M6): what asset class is this, what's the structure and trend, do fundamentals or on-chain flows argue against it? Edge (M5, M9): which playbook setup is this, and is its expectancy positive after costs (M3)? Risk (M9): where is the thesis invalidated — that's the stop; the stop sets the size. Execution (M2–M3): the right order type, sliced for the book's depth. Review (M10): journaled, graded in R, plan-adherence marked.
Notice what's absent: predictions, conviction, certainty. The framework never asks 'what will price do?' — only 'what's the setup, what's it worth, what does it cost when wrong, and did I follow it?'
In the framework, what determines position size?
Why does the framework never ask 'what will price do next?'
The master checklist
This is the course as a checklist. If every box below is honestly checked, you have the infrastructure of a professional operation — before any question of market opinion. Most traders who fail could not have checked half of them.
A checked item is not permanent mastery. Attach evidence—a current export, tested recovery, written limit, reviewed journal, or validated rule—and assign the next review date. Unverified confidence is not an operational control.
What does this course argue actually separates surviving traders from failed ones?